By Andi Anderson
The passage of House Bills 5120 and 5121 in Michigan, which seek to nullify local renewable energy zoning ordinances, has created controversy and opposition from various organizations and individuals.
These bills essentially establish a standardized approach for renewable energy development across Michigan, limiting the autonomy of local governments in deciding their own renewable energy policies. The legislation mandates that local governments adhere to state requirements for permitting large-scale energy projects.
Key points of concern and opposition to these bills include:
- Loss of Local Control: Critics argue that these bills take away local decision-making power, as they impose a one-size-fits-all approach on Michigan's diverse communities. The legislation limits the ability of local townships to set their own policies and regulations regarding renewable energy projects.
- Michigan Farm Bureau's Opposition: The Michigan Farm Bureau (MFB) has expressed strong opposition to the bills, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between renewable energy, land use, private property rights, and farmland preservation. MFB has encouraged individuals to contact their state senators to voice their concerns.
- Short Application Timelines: Under the proposed legislation, renewable energy facilities must apply with the local government within a short, four-month timeline, with the possibility of an extension only if mutually agreed upon. This timeline is seen as restrictive and potentially limiting local input and decision-making.
- Unfettered Land Use: The bills do not place restrictions on the amount of land that can be used for renewable energy facilities in a community, potentially altering the character and nature of these communities for years to come. This is a significant point of contention, as it may lead to large-scale renewable energy projects disrupting rural communities.
- Decibel Levels and Setback Deviations: Critics argue that the legislation does not adequately address noise pollution concerns, as decibel levels remain high, and the bills do not permit any setback deviations from state standards. This lack of flexibility is a point of concern for local communities.
The fate of these bills now rests in the hands of the Michigan Senate, where organizations like the Michigan Farm Bureau, Michigan Townships Association (MTA), Michigan Agri-Business Association (MABA), Michigan Association of Counties, and Southeast Michigan Council of Governments will continue their efforts to oppose the legislation and retain local authority in energy siting decisions.
The passage of these bills in the House may be a point of disappointment for some, but the legislative process is ongoing, and the debate continues in the Senate. It remains to be seen how the Senate will respond to this controversial legislation.
Photo Credit: gettyimages-peopleimages
Categories: Michigan, Energy